我覺得中醫是科學，需要修正的是當代的科學概念。但不修正也不要緊，如此，中醫則不算科學，但此非中醫的損失。

As I pointed out before, Chinese medicine has falsifiability 2 (experimentational), without falsifiability 1 (theoretical). To me, this qualifies as science, if, science is understood as any discipline of investigating reality that returns reliable and consistent results.

But if one insists on that a discipline must have f1 and f2 in order to be recognized as science, it is OK too. Perhaps in the near future some f3 will be introduced, and many studies now will be disqualified from being scientific.

 

所有跟帖： 

• 還有就是我粗淺的觀察，西醫很缺乏自己的理論。它的功效其實來自其它學科的加持。 -中间小谢- ♂ (592 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 18:34:55

• 西医缺乏理论？您可真是什么都敢说啊；当然，楼下还有“西医也不是一无是处”这种奇闻怪谈 -jinjiaodw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:00:21

• 人家也会觉得你是奇谈怪论，少见多怪。 -为人父- ♂ (167 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:06:37

• 也就你和那几位这么认为，拼命想把水搅混没意义 -jinjiaodw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:20:18

• 你说, 他们干嘛搅混水? 想摸大鱼还是摸大西瓜 : )) -铃兰听风- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:02:08

• 小谢, 你知道吗? 毕业离开校园后, 西医学院的医生很快就进入临床实践, 独挡一面; 中医学院的医生, 从生涩到成熟 -铃兰听风- ♀ (42 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:05:30

• 所以我说取消中医学院，跟班老中医是最好的成才途径 -dancingwolf- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:39:11