基因的發現和破解實在太厲害了。不过我反而覺得"西醫"是"不存在"的。

回答: DNA 有多彪悍, 你是知道的铃兰听风2023-01-05 17:09:37

It is the same methods developed with physics, chemistry and biology applied to the human body. It doesn't have its own fundamental theories. Or perhaps it does while I am ignorant about it.  Chinese medicine really offers its own theory and methodology. It perhaps overlooks many things producing the physiology of the human body but it has its particular insights too. No way one can develop acupuncture without the guidance of a theory but by randomly sticking needles into the body and wait for its reaction.

Chinese medicine feels like a top-down approach while western medicine a bottom-up. 

Is it not the most obvious that the only honest approach is to take from each of these disciplines in order to heal patients?

所以,刻意反中醫者起碼就不诚实。

石凳解釋了熱情反中醫者的動機并非出於科學,但我還是不明白他们的心态: 自恨到這個程度起碼很尷尬啊。

所有跟帖: 

俺以前也听到过这个观点:西医并不是一个独立的学科,它只是各种学科在人体健康方面的应用。 -stonebench- 给 stonebench 发送悄悄话 stonebench 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:23:49

Here I borrow the concept of DNA to point out that -铃兰听风- 给 铃兰听风 发送悄悄话 铃兰听风 的博客首页 (749 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:28:06

不太同意“外内法”,但绝对为你中西不同的深刻理解点赞! -stonebench- 给 stonebench 发送悄悄话 stonebench 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:39:30

打个不太恰当的比方 ~ ~ -铃兰听风- 给 铃兰听风 发送悄悄话 铃兰听风 的博客首页 (866 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 21:00:44

我說的 top-down vs bottom-up 即是這個意思 . -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (192 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 21:27:46

哈哈,形象,明白! -stonebench- 给 stonebench 发送悄悄话 stonebench 的博客首页 (81 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 04:53:03

玲珑心, 有的. 心眼儿, 不多 : ) ) -铃兰听风- 给 铃兰听风 发送悄悄话 铃兰听风 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 18:49:52

是。经脉之学不是臆想也不是经验积累。有位祝华英道长曾在静中体验到经脉,把经典中有记载而人们不太清楚的经脉关系完全理顺了 -stonebench- 给 stonebench 发送悄悄话 stonebench 的博客首页 (177 bytes) () 01/05/2023 postreply 20:54:34

DNA同决定DNA表达一定同吗? -dhyang_wxc- 给 dhyang_wxc 发送悄悄话 dhyang_wxc 的博客首页 (224 bytes) () 01/06/2023 postreply 07:31:49

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!