No info from A to B, just happend simultaneously

所有跟帖: 

+1 -西东人8- 给 西东人8 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:19:51

Sorry, I don't quite follow you. -寒苇- 给 寒苇 发送悄悄话 寒苇 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:22:06

Just like Trump & Biden, always say oppositely but no comm -老键- 给 老键 发送悄悄话 老键 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:24:21

They are entangled -老键- 给 老键 发送悄悄话 老键 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:26:31

How exactly? It must be quite a sight. -shuier- 给 shuier 发送悄悄话 shuier 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:00:02

Pardon me. On what basis did you make the above claim? -寒苇- 给 寒苇 发送悄悄话 寒苇 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:27:26

I'm truly interested in relevant experimental studies. -寒苇- 给 寒苇 发送悄悄话 寒苇 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:28:50

i maybe wrong about them but not about quntums, see inside -老键- 给 老键 发送悄悄话 老键 的博客首页 (120 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:35:56

Thank you. Here is an opposite view for your reference: -寒苇- 给 寒苇 发送悄悄话 寒苇 的博客首页 (174 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:43:38

Thx. Yes, it can be used in quntum communication -老键- 给 老键 发送悄悄话 老键 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:47:51

There are always opposite views before the dust settles. -shuier- 给 shuier 发送悄悄话 shuier 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:03:52

EPR "paradox" -冯墟- 给 冯墟 发送悄悄话 冯墟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 18:34:00

有趣的比喻。 -shuier- 给 shuier 发送悄悄话 shuier 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 15:57:28

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!