Entanglement is part & parcel of the communication process.

所有跟帖： 

• No info from A to B, just happend simultaneously -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:16:14

• +1 -西东人8- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:19:51

• Sorry, I don't quite follow you. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:22:06

• Just like Trump & Biden, always say oppositely but no comm -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:24:21

• They are entangled -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:26:31

• How exactly? It must be quite a sight. -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:00:02

• Pardon me. On what basis did you make the above claim? -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:27:26

• I'm truly interested in relevant experimental studies. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:28:50

• i maybe wrong about them but not about quntums, see inside -老键- ♂ (120 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:35:56

• Thank you. Here is an opposite view for your reference: -寒苇- ♀ (174 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:43:38

• Thx. Yes, it can be used in quntum communication -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:47:51

• There are always opposite views before the dust settles. -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:03:52

• EPR "paradox" -冯墟- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 18:34:00

• 有趣的比喻。 -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 15:57:28

• I mearly state a fact, not against your post, sorry for that -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:44:54

• I don't own quantum communication. Neither do you. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:48:23

• Science is a fact-finding mission. That's the whole shebang. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:53:27

• Right. Truly sorry for the disruption -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 14:55:40

• Not at all. Actually I'm glad that you did "interrupt" me. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 15:26:57

• Once in a while we need to pause & do some stocktaking. -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 15:33:06

• 对啊，而且既然在书香，就要多从书里stocktaking。物理学很有意思，可以一起讨论些读物，不是指textbook -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:11:32

• Such as "A Brief History of Time"? Or "Fluid Mechanics"? -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:46:02

• 真是哪壶不开拎哪壶啊 ：））最怕读时间简史了 -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 17:35:53

• 苇苇 is a lady. -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:10:08

• 老键 is a gentleman. -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:08:42

• I always want to be a gentleman but not always is -老键- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:17:53

• You are a 100% gentleman. -shuier- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:39:33

• Mr 老键 is a 100+% gentleman! -寒苇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/30/2023 postreply 16:41:39