This does not make any sense

Not really a tennis fan, but seems your argument has some logic flaws.

"很多人都称费是网球史上最伟大的选手，前边两点就不提了，如果他与同时代的对手纳道都屡战屡败，总成绩7比14，大满贯决赛对决记录是2：5，而且都是在费的巅峰时期（2006-2009），那他连自己时代的最佳球员都算不上，怎么能成为历史最佳？？？"

Then tell me how many grand slam titles Nadal has got so far if you think Nadal is better than Federer. Many times Federal lost to Nadal were on clay court, which I agree Nadal is better. For other court, Nadal can't even make to the final or semi-final, Nadal could not have chance to play against Federer.

My result with Federal is 0:0, simply because we have never played, do you still think I am as good as Federer?

Federer is the best in his era, period. He is probably the best of all time.

所有跟帖： 

• One AO title plus two Wimbledon titles for Nadal -北京板爷- ♂ (37 bytes) () 07/05/2010 postreply 20:27:28

• 从08年初到09年初，费连续在土地，草地和硬地三项大满贯败给纳。。。 -看风景- ♂ (405 bytes) () 07/05/2010 postreply 20:34:14

• 你的逻辑更有问题，你有资格在大满贯比赛么〉？ -sleepdonkey- ♂ (18 bytes) () 07/06/2010 postreply 06:40:30