Technically speaking, the difference between MJ

and Kobe is: MJ plays more in the paint, he posted up a lot of times; Kobe stays in the paremeter a lot, shoots a lot more 3s(he is a better shooter).

The result is different as well. Reason I think is, when you plays in the post, you have basically a 360 degree as your passing angle; While you play in the paremeter, you have less than 180 degree as your passing angle. So, MJ caused more damage than Kobe.

All these experts say NBA is a big man's game, meaning inside-out game is a fundamental stragety, that is why 90 percent of the championship teams have a legit big man in the middle. MJ was able to win without any great centers are because he himself plays in the paint.

Any thoughts?

所有跟帖： 

• Inside-out is the best controllable game to play. -Warsteiner- ♂ (1508 bytes) () 05/08/2006 postreply 12:53:31

• true, but MJ is the one to blame -fanfromchina- ♂ (409 bytes) () 05/08/2006 postreply 12:59:29

• They just make it "xing shi" instead of "sheng shi" -Warsteiner- ♂ (304 bytes) () 05/08/2006 postreply 13:06:41

• exactly -fanfromchina- ♂ (411 bytes) () 05/08/2006 postreply 13:11:03

• Can't blame the kids for trying to imitate MJ though -报社记者- ♂ (175 bytes) () 05/08/2006 postreply 13:28:23