I don't think there're anything wrong with 谜面

建造 definetly apples to the whole sentence. Sometimes the 语气 plays a trick of misleading, but keep in mind 拆字 is always 面别解。
The only concern is:
Is it too 碎 with 并 户 同 - > 扁豆 ？

所有跟帖： 

• 我没说谜不成立，只是分析‘不厚道’在哪里。 -letstalk- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/01/2009 postreply 16:06:46

• 公式是：(并+肩x前+来x同)建造 “饱和次 -letstalk- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/01/2009 postreply 16:24:54

• 抱合词覆盖抱合词本该避免，加上前后倒勾，太难为人了。 -letstalk- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/01/2009 postreply 16:27:21

• that's the trick. like it or not, -GuessABC- ♂ (28 bytes) () 05/01/2009 postreply 17:28:41

• 如老兄这么说，没有重门动脚趾，能有多难有多难。社会责任还是要有的吧？ -letstalk- ♂ (158 bytes) () 05/01/2009 postreply 17:58:08

• you've gone too far! -GuessABC- ♂ (401 bytes) () 05/02/2009 postreply 08:39:23

• 回复：抱合词覆盖抱合词本该避免，加上前后倒勾，太难为人了。 -GuessABC- ♂ (33 bytes) () 05/02/2009 postreply 08:45:43