See inside:

5D2 was about 2 stops better (in noise) than 5D classical (each pixel is better, and almost twice as many pixels), resulting from 3 years of research/improvement.

Now, it is almost 4 years since 5D2.  So Canon should have enough time to make the same progress that it made back when developing 5D2.  So that is "at least 2 stops".  1DX appears to be 3 stops better at the pixel level when compared to 5D2, but it has a slightly less pixels, so over all, it is less than 3 stops better (if each pixel is 3 stops better).

所有跟帖: 

你太乐观了 -贪吃的猪猪- 给 贪吃的猪猪 发送悄悄话 (159 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 10:28:29

对,就是这样。至少是我希望这样。 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (57 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 10:50:56

这上头没有摩尔定律,一个阶段的技术进步饱和很快 -U96- 给 U96 发送悄悄话 U96 的博客首页 (633 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:27:14

Moore定律起作用的例子:Nokia发布41M的手机,比D800还多:) -贪吃的猪猪- 给 贪吃的猪猪 发送悄悄话 (39 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:42:49

那是扯O得没边了。邮票大小整的东西和小指甲盖大小的有啥可比性? -U96- 给 U96 发送悄悄话 U96 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:49:06

digitial zoom and hyperfocal distance? -贪吃的猪猪- 给 贪吃的猪猪 发送悄悄话 (35 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:54:56

谢 pieq 兄 -enTiger744- 给 enTiger744 发送悄悄话 enTiger744 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 10:40:14

多支持2挡, 不一定好2挡... -华翰斋- 给 华翰斋 发送悄悄话 华翰斋 的博客首页 (274 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:17:25

回复:多支持2挡, 不一定好2挡... -贪吃的猪猪- 给 贪吃的猪猪 发送悄悄话 (172 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:34:30

不能只看noise per pixel -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (327 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 11:39:26

派兄这个比较靠谱! -华翰斋- 给 华翰斋 发送悄悄话 华翰斋 的博客首页 (33 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 12:21:53

Come on ,华师这回来只新烟吧 。。。 -enTiger744- 给 enTiger744 发送悄悄话 enTiger744 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2012 postreply 12:54:20

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!