Is film really dead? Try this look with your digi thing!

所有跟帖： 

• as long as it is described in numbers, -多见不怪- ♂ (166 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 11:41:04

• How can you get it then printed with all these tonalities? -teetrinker- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 11:45:40

• well, that again is a chemical problem, not a digital one.... -多见不怪- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:09:45

• so you mean there is no escape from analog tech? :-) -teetrinker- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:22:38

• Well I think we were talking about an 'effect' that was supposed -多见不怪- ♂ (85 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:49:25

• No,we are talking about photography -Teetrinker- ♂ (47 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:57:55

• believe it or not -迷迷瞪瞪- ♂ (292 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:07:56

• hehe, there seems to be no escape... -多见不怪- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:11:31

• for BW, you are not dependent on any service shop -Teetrinker- ♂ (34 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:23:56

• 这就是我说的实验室DIY级别的，可以少数人自己玩，但不再是个规模经济。 -U96- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:32:48

• That's why film will stay as a niche for a quite lon time -Teetrinker- ♂ (84 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:45:15

• 回复：I never used films. So, I'm not sure if it -jassco- ♂ (86 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 18:25:05

• 黑白胶片早就不是“消费级规模”经济了，自从有了彩负后 -瓜哥- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:22:31

• totally agreed. -akiller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:37:38

• I do not see anything in the photo that is "film" specific. -pieq314- ♀ (128 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:37:48

• 这张片子可以看得出胶片乳剂的感觉，数码的恐难作到这个效果， -akiller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:42:18

• I am quite sure some one can come up with an algorithm to produc -pieq314- ♀ (249 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:52:38

• Sure you can do that, but it is always a question of justifiable -Teetrinker- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 12:56:19

• What do you mean by "justifiable"? -pieq314- ♀ (358 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:26:33

• justifiable expenses -Teetrinker- ♂ (31 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:37:56

• A lot of people have Photoshop already. -pieq314- ♀ (141 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 16:06:09

• 尊重个人观点，但是不能苟同 -瓜哥- ♂ (191 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:52:10

• yeah -pieq314- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 16:19:13

• With the algorithm to simulate film, the program might -瓜哥- ♂ (70 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:24:20

• Not with today's computer. It should take a few seconds at most -pieq314- ♀ (66 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:27:29

• 有了这软件，一定告诉我一声！不要山寨版的！ -瓜哥- ♂ (28 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:35:41

• I am 100% sure you can do it with Photoshop. But since I do not -pieq314- ♀ (269 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 16:04:22

• I am 100% sure nobody did it with only Photoshop. -瓜哥- ♂ (34 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 17:36:24

• 让胶片来的更胶片吧！让数码来得更数码吧！ -瓜哥- ♂ (32 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:26:04

• Three cheers for this statement. -Teetrinker- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 13:36:07

• exactly -NikonD3- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 14:48:18

• 作个不恰当比喻，开手排车和自动车的区别就想到胶片和数码 -grid- ♂ (102 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 15:38:19

• 跑车大多数都是手动的。。。 -akiller- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 16:28:49

• 同理,自动档的人无法体会到跑车的加速度和入弯漂移的乐趣 -瓜哥- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 17:38:44

• 回复：It depends on your definition of what is "DEAD". -jassco- ♂ (303 bytes) () 08/28/2009 postreply 18:13:56