meaning: $100 camera produce same web picture as 1ds mark 3

所有跟帖： 

• Not exact. 1DMarkIII gives you accurate color, less CA, and spee -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 18:59:31

• you can always use software -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:11:38

• 你没浅景深，没快速拍摄抓取瞬间，没大宽容度，没暗环境下低噪音高分辨 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (22 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:18:08

• 1ds mark III came out too -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:12:54

• It's not 1998, $100= 5Mps or more for a DC. -WayCool- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:02:35

• so $30 camera is good enough -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:11:13

• 数字摄影不仅仅是像素。道理就是如此。 -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:19:29

• i was planing to buy a 1dsmark3 today, talked a great deal with -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:28:28

• with the store owner, it is overkill, is is better than the came -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:29:45

• the cameras of most magzine, newspaper reports in the us -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:30:47

• so unless u want to have your own phote business, 1dsmark3 is ov -赌球为生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:31:37

• Can't agree more. How about 5D Mark II if you don't do sports? -用户名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2008 postreply 19:34:48