From Technical Point

First, let me put it, those are not great pictures, that I will proudly display everywhere, but they are good enough for me to illustrate my point.

Your post is flawed in the following areas:

1. "聚焦，测光都不到位"
the focus of this picture is where it needs to be ( the eye ),due to shallow DOP, so the the bottles in the front are not in focus, but that's the result I like.
2. " 曝光补偿-0.7过低"
In my post, I said TTL -0.7, which means I lowered the flash output, does not mean the overall exposure, the actual overall exposure are actually +1 bias.
Exposure is right where I want, if you look at her shirt, it's white to a point of being blown out, so this is the highest I can go in terms of lighting, the rest is dark due to overall lighting conditions.
3. "感光速度400在此特定环境中不应算高，但片子背景还是有些噪"
This is due to D100 performance, not much I can do as long as you nail the exposure.
4.博物馆的几个摆件，都不太清晰，最后一张教堂的蜡烛画质也差。
All the 摆件showing how DOP works in the samples, and focus point is where I need to be, and the DOP really shines with F1.8, it is intended that way.

Picture quality is something hard to judge based on such small size, but some of it attribute to ISO 400 as well.

I welcome constructive criticism, but please based on facts, don't use words like " quibble" " inexcusable", then the discussing could benefit lots of others as well.

所有跟帖： 

• I mean DOF -天逸- ♂ (58 bytes) () 04/06/2007 postreply 14:34:11