Any comments about Canon 17-40mm F/4L?

such as its overall capability and low light performance.

Thanks.

所有跟帖： 

• hand hold low light? f2.8 with IS would be better -lilywxc- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:18:10

• Canon 24-70mm F/2.8 IS? $$$$$ -gameover- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:26:26

• Such lens does not exist. -pieq314- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:56:45

• 我就用Canon 17-40mm F/4L头,感觉照风景很好. -py11- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:19:26

• what about portrait and other general function? -gameover- ♂ (8 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:24:41

• 照portrait时我就换70-200的头了.好象不太适合. -py11- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:33:51

• 17-40照风景似乎短了点.你觉得呢? -Fruitpassion- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:35:21

• I think the major purpose of this lens is wide angle? -sqllsq- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 18:45:37

• 是的,我现在就缺少中间段的头,但广度够了. -PY11- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 19:08:33

• how about 24-70 f/2.8? it is out of stock in many stores -sqllsq- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 20:41:56

• 如果像你一样有5弟，当然也像你一样上24-105mm f/4L IS -田头- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 19:21:52

• 50-70这段是比较理想的. -Fruitpassion- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 17:36:00

• very impressive with your recent landscape PP, oh -sqllsq- ♂ (29 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 18:44:02

• 谢谢了. -py11- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 19:11:29

• Unless you are thinking about full frame, -pieq314- ♀ (610 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 18:01:19

• 性能不比套头好多少。但做工精，拿在手里的感觉好，就容易出片 -小夏- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 21:44:26

• 性价比最好的L头。方便实用，推荐买。 -enjoywater- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/20/2007 postreply 22:11:59

• 俺就用这个，清晰度没得说，就是对焦有问题： -牛头马面- ♂ (62 bytes) () 03/21/2007 postreply 10:01:27