虽然算不得抄袭,但壁画翻拍,也没什么太大的意思?

来源: 2019-07-15 09:29:09 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1705 bytes)
回答: 街拍剑伯2019-07-14 08:28:54

您的ID让人不好称呼呀:))请看下面的文章。

Does photographing street art violate the street artist’s copyright?
Under U.S. copyright law, the violation of a copyright owner’s exclusive rights occurs when an infringer copies and/or creates a “derivative work” that is a copy or “substantially similar” to the copyright owner’s work. Thus, taking the photograph of a colorful mural alone, for the specific purpose of making a copy of the mural itself, may violate the mural artist’s copyright, especially if the image is then sold by the photographer for a commercial purpose (such as an advertisement). However, professional photographers often use street art as a backdrop to their projects or photograph the mural together with other elements, and creatively use lighting and composition to create something that is more unique and thus “original” to the photographer. In such cases, a defense known as “fair use” may apply. Unfortunately, though, there is currently no way to definitively measure when infringement ends and a new work begins.  

https://live.staticflickr.com/1945/44302092534_0625931a07_b.jpg

所有跟帖: 

谢谢冬梦的意见和提供的资料! -剑伯- 给 剑伯 发送悄悄话 剑伯 的个人群组 (0 bytes) () 07/15/2019 postreply 10:27:09

加跟帖:

  • 笔名:      密码: 保持登录状态一个月,直到我退出登录。
  • 标题:
  • 内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]
回到顶部