Other than wide angle, what is the advantage of FX over DX?

来源: Big_Benz 2015-03-07 11:40:50 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (329 bytes)
I am exploring the possibility of getting a new body.  It seems the DX bodies are of lower cost than those of FX ones. 

For me, 24 MP is more than plenty. 

Please share your thoughts.  Thanks.

My primary usage is to do portraits. 

所有跟帖: 

No idea you can search Full-frame vs. APS-C from Internet. -M45- 给 M45 发送悄悄话 M45 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/07/2015 postreply 13:08:52

The size of each pixel on the sensor on FX is larger than that o -ezra- 给 ezra 发送悄悄话 ezra 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/07/2015 postreply 18:28:06

DX fits pixels on small area than FX, each pixel receive less li -三河匹夫- 给 三河匹夫 发送悄悄话 (173 bytes) () 03/07/2015 postreply 18:41:41

DX够了 -fantasticdream- 给 fantasticdream 发送悄悄话 fantasticdream 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/08/2015 postreply 06:48:49

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”