Unfortunately, this opinion was from a RELATIVE of Mr. Chin

来源: 2016-02-28 15:07:19 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (924 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ rubikscube ] 在 2016-02-28 18:51:40 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

One has to repect her right against using her late uncle's name in things she disagree with. You cannot argue against a dead person or a relative thereof. 

On the other hand, many ACTIVISTS were behind Mr. Liang's case for their own agendas. It is fundamentally wrong to say that since the white officers were let go, so should Mr. Liang. It is equally wrong to say that if Mr. Liang were let go, justice would be served.

The fact that Mr. Chin's name was inserted into the articles talking about Mr. Liang's case shows that some ACTIVISTS wanted to marshal support from all fronts, gain moral high ground over their opponents, and highlight the race factor while overlooking the underlying criminal acts.

One last question: Who lives in that dreadful, dark place where the shooting occurred, the Black, the White, or the Chinese?

所有跟帖: 

Nobody said Liang should be let go. -加共- 给 加共 发送悄悄话 加共 的个人群组 (475 bytes) () 02/28/2016 postreply 15:24:23

Then wait for the sentencing. Crime will be punished. -rubikscube- 给 rubikscube 发送悄悄话 rubikscube 的博客首页 rubikscube 的个人群组 (1739 bytes) () 02/28/2016 postreply 18:47:32

加跟帖:

  • 笔名:      密码: 保持登录状态一个月,直到我退出登录。
  • 标题:
  • 内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]
回到顶部