one more comment

来源: dynamic 2009-04-25 03:02:49 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1066 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ dynamic ] 在 2009-04-30 07:14:03 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: 回复:朋友们试试这个,不知道几星dynamic2009-04-25 02:36:31
The proof goes like this for n mod 4 = 3 (also works for n mod 4 = 1):

By the construction in claim 2 we got a proper coloring for white grids. Suppose we also have a proper coloring for black grids.

Observation: If a black grid is on the boundary, then its red white neighbor is also on the boundary. This follows by the nature of the construction in claim 2.

Notice that each internal grid covers 4 grids, each non-corner boundary grid covers 3, and each corner covers 2. Also notice that at least 2 corners are white red, so the number of white grids covered by black red grids is at least larger than the black grids covered by 2. Notice that in a proper coloring each grid is covered exactly once and the # of black grids and white grids differ by 1, so we have a contradiction.

To see the last part:

internal red black (covers 4) -> neighboring red white (covers 3 or 4)
boundary red black (covers 3) -> neighboring red white (covers 2 or 3)
however, at least 2 corners are covered, so the difference is at least 2.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”