我觉得这就是歼10的正确描述

F-16 is a proven platform. The performance could be verified by the third party, as F-16 exported to many oversea customers, Gripen also has its buyers.

F-2 is a licensed variant of F-16 with some improvements, or it’s considered as F-16 customized by Japan.

J-10 is a non proven design, no oversea buyers, the Lavi design which they told that J-10 based on, isn’t the non proven design as well.

So who can compare those ?

所有跟帖： 

• 不好意思，此乃转发，中立的做法。 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:41:18

• 链接呢？ -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:46:42

• 我看了一下，这里应该不用with, 呵呵 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:42:58

• 太中国了, 呵呵 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:57:07

• who can compare J-10 with those (F-16 and F-2) -bluesky231- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:55:23

• 显然他不清楚作者要表达什么意思 -bluesky231- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 04:05:46

• 不用with -松涛孤雁- ♂ (59 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:14:29

• 要实事求是，别像武术一样吹牛。一打就暴了，然后就说没发内功怕伤了对方，：） -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:40:10

• 墙外没人在乎这个, 结果等比了再说。 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:49:12

• 这一句 “the Lavi design ... isn’t the non proven design as well." 似 -欲千北- ♂ (174 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 04:38:52

• 作者的意思是, Lavi都不是, 何况10 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:52:27

• 虽然知道作者的意思但其英文都乱写把is a写成isn't the -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:50:35

• +100 -欲千北- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 14:27:29

• I don’t know nothing about this -BeyondWind- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 15:28:47

• Lavi 后面那个they指代不明吧 -telljoke- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 06:58:27

• Lavi是以色列用F16改进而来的而J10是中国用Lavi改进而来的。J10的确没打过仗是难证明，只能用旁证。 -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:53:33

• 呵呵，看来，两岸的J10和F16V，不交手，这些无厘头的吵架，还会没完没了。 -吃素的狼- ♀ (237 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 16:20:25