I see another issue here.

According to what you said, the previous will is very likely a joint/mutual will, accompanying with an agreement/contract, if drafted and executeed correctly. If that's the case, your grandpa should not have revoked it as it is a joint/mutual will and should be taken as it is after one of the parties deseased. But I wouldn't know for sure until seeing all the documents.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：I see another issue here. -讨公道- ♂ (547 bytes) () 09/02/2009 postreply 12:38:44

• 一個很好奇的問題,如果您的父親都不急,您急什麼? -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/02/2009 postreply 13:16:18

• 只想每个人有个公平公正的结果. -讨公道- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/02/2009 postreply 13:25:24

• 你已经钻进钱眼里出不来了！ -静听海- ♀ (243 bytes) () 09/02/2009 postreply 14:15:21

• 回复：你已经钻进钱眼里出不来了！ -讨公道- ♂ (27 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 06:20:30

• 是一个律师比我还急 -讨公道- ♂ (229 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 06:19:26

• 回复：是一个律师比我还急 -單身老貓- ♂ (1546 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 08:02:53

• 回复：回复：是一个律师比我还急 -讨公道- ♂ (317 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 08:47:27

• 回复：回复：回复：是一个律师比我还急 -單身老貓- ♂ (948 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 13:22:54

• 回复：回复：回复：回复：是一个律师比我还急 -HSK- ♂ (81 bytes) () 09/03/2009 postreply 21:03:53