My first advice: pay the fine as requested.
If you don't like the idea and don't want to pay them at all, here are something you can consider.
1. Larceny (
2. It is not clear how you were treated at the store. Before the police came, what did they do? Did they question you? Humiliate you? Did other people in the store notice? Did they confine you? If any of these happened, you have a good claim of false imprisonment. Shopkeeper's priviledge requires the store to use reassonable force to conduct reasonable investigation, if they reasonably believed that you were lifting goods. Matter of fact you were lifting, no matter whether you forgot to pay or intended to steal. If any of the conducts was not reasonable, you can counterclaim a false imprisonment, but not in the same court. Larceny belongs to crminial court and false imprisonment belongs to civil court. If a false imprisonment can be established then the recovery could be in the millions because one of the injuries FI to protect is mental tranquility. Only then, would a lawyer be interested in the case.
回复:律师不接的案子
所有跟帖:
•
回复:回复:律师不接的案子
-66196-
♀
(119 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:01:26
•
案子发生在纽约,我人在加州读书,折腾不起(:
-8231416-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:15:51
•
想知道,KOHLS 的钱该交吗?法官不是已经判了,KOHLS 为何还要我交罚
-8231416-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:23:36
•
如果律师接你的案子,律师费很少有少于1000的,律师也不想
-绿豆豆-
♀
(20 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:26:11
•
那我该交罚款吗?豆豆?
-8231416-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:29:28
•
200快省你1000块和无尽的折磨,你说呢
-绿豆豆-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:32:17
•
再说你就算付了律师费也照样要看律师的脸色,那时你就骑虎难下了
-绿豆豆-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:34:25
•
kohls 已经把我送上法庭,法官没要我交罚款,这个是
-8231416-
♀
(24 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:41:56
•
回复:案子发生在纽约,我人在加州读书,折腾不起(:
-66196-
♀
(667 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:33:59
•
法官只是判我六个月不犯罪,案子会dismiss,再无其他,
-8231416-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:47:04
•
回复:法官只是判我六个月不犯罪,案子会dismiss,再无其他,
-68156-
♀
(84 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
19:07:27
•
这样做只会把事情越高越大,楼主看起来经受不起这折腾。
-绿豆豆-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/28/2005 postreply
17:01:57