回复：案子发生在纽约，我人在加州读书，折腾不起（：

来源: 66196 于 2005-11-28 17:33:59 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (667 bytes)
本帖于 2005-12-20 19:14:32 时间, 由普通用户 stp 编辑
回答: 回复：回复：律师不接的案子 由 66196 于 2005-11-28 17:01:26

Then you really have to pay the fine. There may be another way.

If the $200 was from a court judgment, then it is liquidated and you really have no claim to it except pay for it.

If, for some reason, the $200 is from Kohls, then you can still call them to settle to get it reduced. Even a portion could help. Let them beleive you made a mistake.

It is not clear to me at this point. If it is a court order, then you have to pay the court, not Kohls. If it is coming from the store, then you get to keep the goods after you pay for them. Kohls can not fine you for wrongdoing. If they do that, it would be a violation of the 14th Amandment.

所有跟帖： 

• 法官只是判我六个月不犯罪,案子会dismiss,再无其他, -8231416- ♀ 给 8231416 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/28/2005 postreply 17:47:04

• 回复：法官只是判我六个月不犯罪,案子会dismiss,再无其他, -68156- ♀ 给 68156 发送悄悄话 (84 bytes) () 11/28/2005 postreply 19:07:27

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！