不太适用

回答: 你再读一遍楼上的英文原文。加州老李2016-05-11 09:33:37
Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 以上文字的理解,应该是两个条件(1)out of post office or letter carrier's custody (红字部分)AND (2)before it has been delieved to the person. 那么,收到给别人的信件,满足第二条件,before it has been delivered to the person, 但是信件不在邮局或者邮递人员的控制下,所以,这一段文字,并不适用于楼主的情况。 ' target='_blank'>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702

Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 以上文字的理解,应该是两个条件(1)out of post office or letter carrier's custody (红字部分)AND (2)before it has been delieved to the person. 那么,收到给别人的信件,满足第二条件,before it has been delivered to the person, 但是信件不在邮局或者邮递人员的控制下,所以,这一段文字,并不适用于楼主的情况。

所有跟帖: 

第二个条件解读不对 -jingxi02- 给 jingxi02 发送悄悄话 (2496 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:15:55

私家的邮箱可能是“authorized depository for mail matter”。 -加州老李- 给 加州老李 发送悄悄话 加州老李 的博客首页 (116 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:22:07

你家的信箱是authorized by whom? -jingxi02- 给 jingxi02 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:25:38

根据美国刑法第194条( § 194 of the Criminal Code) -加州老李- 给 加州老李 发送悄悄话 加州老李 的博客首页 (872 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:33:57

光会google又不去研究怎样才适用有屁用 -jingxi02- 给 jingxi02 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:38:19

你这种回答,我一点不意外,呵呵。 -加州老李- 给 加州老李 发送悄悄话 加州老李 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:40:39

美国最高法院的解释,私家邮箱可以是“authorized depository for mail matter” -加州老李- 给 加州老李 发送悄悄话 加州老李 的博客首页 (150 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:27:49

你是不是想说你下次从你自己家的邮箱拿出邮件时就要将你绳之於法? -jingxi02- 给 jingxi02 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:33:41

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!