insurance should pay

来源: 柠檬椰子汁 于 2015-09-13 13:18:47 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (417 bytes)
回答: 多谢柠檬的帮助及大家的建议！ 由 阿拉蕾ya 于 2015-09-13 12:51:40

On their service contract, inspector usually disclaims any defects behind walls where they could not see. Even if he is responsible, he is only responsible for the inspection fees you paid ($200-300).  He is not responsible for the actual damages.

The seller might claim he doesn't know about the leak.  Past leaks are not evidence that present leak exists and known. 

所有跟帖： 

• 谢谢。几乎1/3的地板下方都是经年积累的霉，即使如此，seller也没责任吗？ -阿拉蕾ya- ♀ 给 阿拉蕾ya 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:23:20

• How do you prove that he knew about it? -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 (1071 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:28:18

• 还是柠檬厉害。这个概念多少人都扯不清。这样一句话就说的很清楚。 -PineRock- ♂ 给 PineRock 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:41:19

• 嗯，看来我是问对人了。可是，如果我的insurance company来看后说，这 -阿拉蕾ya- ♀ 给 阿拉蕾ya 发送悄悄话 (205 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:02:43

• Your insurance company should cover it, but -PineRock- ♂ 给 PineRock 发送悄悄话 (223 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:32:15

• so basically seller does not have to disclose anything -sayyousayme- ♂ 给 sayyousayme 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:34:48

• 只要您能够确定对方找不到证据 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ 给 柠檬椰子汁 发送悄悄话 (398 bytes) () 09/14/2015 postreply 09:43:20

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！