"Long" is too indefinite

来源: F.Magath 于 2004-09-13 08:41:10 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (375 bytes)

Whether you can succeed depends on the nature of the contract. If it is an at will contract, they can lay you off even for no reason. If you have a contract set for a definite term, then you can ask for compensation. If the contract doesn't mention, it is presumed to be at will contract. Even with the word "long relationship", it should still be an at will contract.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复："Long" is too indefinite -Mike_Smith_2004- ♂ 给 Mike_Smith_2004 发送悄悄话 (135 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 08:46:02

• 回复：回复："Long" is too indefinite -單身老貓- ♀ 给 單身老貓 发送悄悄话 (282 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 09:10:07

• They can lay him off even if -F.Magath- ♀ 给 F.Magath 发送悄悄话 (156 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 09:16:06

• Even if it's true, who gives a -Toss!!!###- ♀ 给 Toss!!!### 发送悄悄话 (220 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 09:21:25

• Sorry, wrong place. I meant to -dKLKSKDDSS- ♀ 给 dKLKSKDDSS 发送悄悄话 (37 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 09:22:41

• "Long" is a manipulative term -F.Magath- ♀ 给 F.Magath 发送悄悄话 (575 bytes) () 09/13/2004 postreply 09:14:06

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！