my point was "GROWTH" than preservation

来源: 大家帮我买房 于 2012-03-06 19:46:57 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (227 bytes)
回答: you are missing the point here,,, 由 hercules007 于 2012-03-06 19:37:07


Gold might be ok for purchasing power preservation. But you cannot count on gold for growth. You have to invest to gain the growth. Investing in equities will definitely outperform holding gold.

my 2 cents.

所有跟帖： 

• true, but you forgot one thing -朱哥靓- ♂ 给 朱哥靓 发送悄悄话 朱哥靓 的博客首页 (225 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 20:39:35

• i think it's personal style -大家帮我买房- ♂ 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:55:39

• That arguments is not correct -天下多蚤- ♀ 给 天下多蚤 发送悄悄话 (589 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 21:42:40

• 回复：That arguments is not correct -大家帮我买房- ♂ 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (531 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:58:33

• 你的巨大误区，，，回复：my point was "GROWTH" than preservation -hercules007- ♂ 给 hercules007 发送悄悄话 hercules007 的博客首页 (380 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 21:46:23

• 其实你和我说的差不多 -大家帮我买房- ♂ 给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 (327 bytes) () 03/06/2012 postreply 22:54:30

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！