To Xiaobaitu - Re: your response to Sunshine_r

Dear Xiaobaitu: according to your response to Sunshine_r, a divorce certificate from China is invalid if both parties are in the US even though they got married in China and both are Chinese citizen. Could you please provide the orignal citation of the US divorce law or the resource at where we can check? I don't quite understand. Both US and China should respect the court's decision in either country. Thanks a lot!

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：To Xiaobaitu - Re: your response to Sunshine_r -xiaobaitu- ♀ (278 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:06:56

• 那两人都在US的该怎么离才算呢？ -xiaoha- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:10:25

• 经过美国家事法院法官判决,that's so -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:20:03

• 我有点疑问, 只要洲法HONOR这样的离婚, 移民法也会的. -乱讲- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:19:29

• 那样要看移民官或移民法官如何认为，在移民问题上只有联邦机构有权决 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:22:37

• 但在婚姻法上, 移民法厅并没有什么权力. -乱讲- ♂ (72 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:29:24

• 看,出现不同意见了吧?听谁的? -无意得罪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 13:38:37

• 本坛的宗旨就是自由争论. 没必要验明正身. -乱讲- ♂ (81 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:32:43

• 不说了,互联网本身就是虚拟的.得罪了. -无意得罪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:42:22

• 以前有实际判例是如此，当事人可以提出抗辩，但我看不出有什么正当理 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:42:24

• 由在两个人都在美国的情况下要在中国离婚 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:43:29

• 很多理由,至少可以省钱. -乱讲- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:46:41

• 美国家事法院自己达成协议并入表不要花很多钱,特别是没有财产和子女 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:53:12

• 争议的情况下 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 14:53:47

• 当时人不懂如何离婚, 找律师要不要花钱. -乱讲- ♂ (73 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 15:04:01