When you apply H1, USCIS will ask for approval notice of your J1 waiver. Therefore H1 doesn't apply to you. There is no way to avoid J1 waiver if you want to apply H1 or greencard in future. If you just stay in US for a couple of years, that's very easy -- just ask for J1; if you want to to apply H1 or greencard in future, the best way is still to ask for J1. If you want to do your J1 waiver, you need to make sure you can easily get approval from your original institution. The easest way is to transfer your "Dang An" to "Ren Cai Jiao Liu Zhong Xin". Once you are clean in China, it shouldn't have any problems to have your J1 waivered.
Since you never applied for your J1 waiver before, you don't have any issue of "2 waivers" like the guy "Suggest!!" said.
Good luck!
Suggestions
所有跟帖:
•
谢谢楼上各位回复,再请教大侠playxyzzz。请进,
-撒哈拉-
♀
(209 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
14:51:41
•
回复:谢谢楼上各位回复,再请教大侠playxyzzz。请进,
-playxyzzz-
♀
(1269 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
15:58:43
•
The problem is that Chinese Embassy cares what kinds of J1.
-mytwocents-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
16:11:44
•
he/she had
-mytwocents-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
16:17:07
•
Chinese Embassy only cares
-playxyzzz-
♀
(255 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
20:54:05
•
回复:Chinese Embassy only cares
-mytwocents-
♂
(103 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
06:37:36
•
What you said is the story back to 1980s
-playxyzzz-
♀
(139 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
10:03:02
•
回复:谢谢楼上各位回复,再请教大侠playxyzzz。请进,
-mytwocents-
♂
(150 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
16:16:36
•
One more thing
-playxyzzz-
♀
(521 bytes)
()
03/02/2006 postreply
20:47:44
•
Never heard the rule. I think he can
-mytwocents-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
06:40:52
•
回复:Never heard the rule. I think he can
-playxyzzz-
♀
(230 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
07:28:09
•
Of course, be he complies with the two-year
-mytwocents-
♂
(247 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
07:55:35
•
Should before he (not be he)
-mytwocents-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
07:56:15
•
Check USCIS
-playxyzzz-
♀
(197 bytes)
()
03/03/2006 postreply
09:59:44