Do not scare people
所有跟帖:
•
1400 is too aggressive for
-__nobody-
♂
(72 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
16:26:07
•
美国经济真的要大衰退吗?
-breakouts-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
16:30:27
•
Conditions certainly exist,
-__nobody-
♂
(194 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
16:34:44
•
回复:Conditions certainly exist,
-breakouts-
♀
(63 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
16:53:36
•
No, if housing burst, 1400
-uptrend-
♂
(16 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:07:18
•
俺也认为房产泡沫迟早要破,只是怎么破和破的程度问题.
-breakouts-
♀
(68 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:13:16
•
Nasdaq was 1100 in 2002,
-__nobody-
♂
(82 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:33:22
•
1100是以INTERNET为代表的高科技泡沫破裂和
-breakouts-
♀
(33 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:39:10
•
不是完全不可能
-QQQoptions-
♀
(157 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:46:40
•
现在没有当时的bubble, 也没有911.如果..
-beserious-
♀
(332 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
17:59:52
•
考验2000破了牛就玩完了几年升势告一段落
-号子手-
♂
(24 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
16:35:10
•
if naz crash, 1600-1530
-7020-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/12/2005 postreply
18:36:37