I won't be surprised to see 1100 during next 2 years.
1400 is too aggressive for
I won't be surprised to see 1100 during next 2 years.
所有跟帖:
• 美国经济真的要大衰退吗? -breakouts- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 16:30:27
• Conditions certainly exist, -__nobody- ♂ (194 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 16:34:44
• 回复:Conditions certainly exist, -breakouts- ♀ (63 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 16:53:36
• No, if housing burst, 1400 -uptrend- ♂ (16 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:07:18
• 俺也认为房产泡沫迟早要破,只是怎么破和破的程度问题. -breakouts- ♀ (68 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:13:16
• Nasdaq was 1100 in 2002, -__nobody- ♂ (82 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:33:22
• 1100是以INTERNET为代表的高科技泡沫破裂和 -breakouts- ♀ (33 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:39:10
• 不是完全不可能 -QQQoptions- ♀ (157 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:46:40
• 现在没有当时的bubble, 也没有911.如果.. -beserious- ♀ (332 bytes) () 10/12/2005 postreply 17:59:52