宽宏有大量想得开的，一般不得癌症，这里有个帖子值得一读

下面是Daniel Davis的帖子，出自这里：

http://www.pocketables.net/2011/08/whats-gonna-happen-to-apple.html#comments

I completely disagree with absolutely EVERYTHING this article has said. It wasn't Steve who innovated in any way, shape or form.

First off- the initial Apple innovations, like the Apple I and Apple II?

That was Steve Wozniak's design. Steve was the salesman, and another individual provided the first funding for manufacture.

Pre-Macintosh? Steve's greatest "contribution" to Apple was to force the designers of the Apple III to omit ventilation holes, leaving a computer that would get so hot that the motherboard chips would pop out.

Steve barely contributed to the Macintosh project at all- that would be the combined genius of Bill Atkinson, Steve Wozniak's revolutionary multi-speed floppy drive, as well as the contributions of countless others.

The outer shell design of the Mac was designed by Jerry Manock and Terry Oyama.

Steve Jobs main contribution to the Macintosh project? Yelling at people and insisting that the design would not have a fan, resulting in overheating and component failure as a result.

Steve was kicked out of Apple because he was a self-serving egomaniac who abused his employees, not because of some sort of vendetta.

And you want to honor this man?

If you want to talk about Modern Apple- you can thank Jonathan Ives for that. Steve Jobs? You can thank him for the disappearance of useful and purposeful buttons on Apple's stuff, resulting in severe loss of functionality.

I welcome an Apple without Job's egomania, without a man who parks in handicapped spots simply because he wants to demonstrate that he can afford the ticket. He is not a visionary- he is not a designer. He is a salesman, selling the ideas of better and brighter men while lapping up the accolades for it.

所有跟帖： 

• 看了这篇文章之后，我想去查查到底拿破仑、麦克阿瑟之流到底亲手杀了多少敌人。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (47 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:40:11

• 你正好不是宽宏有大量想得开的 -tsc12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:40:57

• 你在这里公开给我上课，我都虚心接受，还要怎么样才算宽宏有大量想得开？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:58:30

• 你诅咒人怎能算宽宏有大量？ -tsc12- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:47:50

• 我诅咒谁了？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:56:21

• 哈哈：【战国策】劳心者治人，劳力者治于人 -逗蟋蟀- ♀ (208 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:46:02

• 是啊不知道这么些大牛们为什么非要赖在苹果不走。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 12:59:38

• 文章偏颇，就算都是事实，不是谁都敢进军手机市场 -iCall- ♂ (92 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 13:16:47

• 进军手机市场有啥了不起？ -专门打假- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 16:14:03

• 没错，在深圳，连阿猫阿狗都做手机啦，还说什么“不是谁都敢进军手机市场”？：-） -九叔- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 21:06:57

• 比尔盖茨没有厚着脸默认什么都是他发明的。你们会说本来他就是拷苹果的 -fitwxc- ♂ (525 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 13:36:39

• 因为这里有重大不同 -moneyIterator- ♂ (568 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:01:17

• 是微软，而不是苹果，把PC送入千家万户 - 类似地，苹果让大众享受智能手机带来的好处 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:50:22

• 微软靠的是低价和PC的开放体系（注意开放是IBM的概念跟微软无关哦）。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (170 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:02:23

• 你说的都是细节，我说的是现象 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:05:26

• 你是说表面现象？;) -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:11:36

• 我说的是事实，你企图解释现象发生的原因 -mc3361- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:15:04

• 对知识产权的理解很难说得清 -iCall- ♂ (584 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 14:59:10

• 你说得对，要定量地说确实不容易。但是在定性的角度来看，是不是iPhone引起了手机的革命？。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:05:27

• 你对智能手机的历史太不了解了。微软正在起诉苹果你不知道？ -fitwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:00:03

• 微软在手机上专利还真不多，因为它原来基本不做Cellular部分。 -moneyIterator- ♂ (231 bytes) () 08/25/2011 postreply 15:10:55