中国天文学在最近10年取得了伟大的进步!

A short 8 years ago, Chinese space exploration was extremely backward and uninformed of current activities.  The only thing those engineers knew was sending men into low earth orbit.  Yes, they were engineers that controlled Chinese space program.  They knew nothing about science.  The science they knew was 太空育种,哈哈, 让人笑掉大牙!  They knew nothing (at least, pretend to know nothing) about the robotic explorations. 

However, in the last decade, scientists slowly gained a voice in how to spend research money.  For example, 嫦娥 program is an example: it costs MUCH less than the useless Shengzhou spaceship, but produced vastly greater scientific results!

Not all space explorations need to be in space.  Ground based telescopes are extremely important, and China does not have good telescopes.  Again, scientists got hold of some money, and recently contructed a 4-m telescope (the previous size was a little over 2 meters, and there are only 2 of them in China). China has less than 10 telescopes at 1 meter and up (1 4-meter telescope, 2 2-m telescope, and a few 1 meter telescopes).

China is also building an observatory in Antarctica, on Dome A to be precise.  In fact, right now, there is a team there to service the observatory there.  Antarctica is the best observation site on Earth, and a lot easier to get to than space.

China is also collaborating internationally.  For example, China is a 10% partner in building a 30-m telescope.   It will cost 1 billion dollars.  If China did not waste the money on Shenzhou, China could have contributed sufficient money so that this telescope could be build now (contribute more will result more telescope time).

In summary, with scientists beginning to gain control of the space money, useful science is showing up.

所有跟帖: 

政府想做好的确实能做好,中国的军工素质很高 -xiaoyuzi- 给 xiaoyuzi 发送悄悄话 xiaoyuzi 的博客首页 (132 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 08:53:51

只要有钱就好办事。自己不会的话,跟会的人合作就行。 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:34:52

yes -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:35:07

应该是航天工程, not 天文学. 天文学是一门基础学科 -ily- 给 ily 发送悄悄话 ily 的博客首页 (317 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:25:51

以前工程师完全掌权的时候,他们就是完全把它当成一个工程问题,不考虑科学价值。 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (288 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:33:52

哈哈,明明是你自己不懂,把航天工程当作天文学,就不要辩解了。掌权的把航天工程当作科学也好,当作工程也罢,他们不会把航天工程当做天 -没办法只好注册- 给 没办法只好注册 发送悄悄话 (185 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 12:59:35

你觉得嫦娥是航天工程?看来你的思想还停留在10前中国(世界四五十年前)的水平呀。 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (194 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 16:30:35

嫦娥项目算成航天工程比算成天文学更靠谱些,你可明白? -没办法只好注册- 给 没办法只好注册 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 20:00:14

你硬要算我也没办法,只要不冒出月球育种这类 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (93 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 21:07:23

你把天文学的基本概念都弄错了,东拉西扯的有意思吗?这里除了PB和你外,谁看不出来? -没办法只好注册- 给 没办法只好注册 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/18/2012 postreply 06:49:56

看来你把美国的, ESA的 Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,Asteroid missions都看成工程 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/18/2012 postreply 08:27:36

中国军工抄前苏联,民用抄欧美,坚持此方针,前途是光明滴:)) -金山法海- 给 金山法海 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 09:34:39

按照猫论,炒也没关系,只要知道自己在做什么就行。 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/17/2012 postreply 10:28:12

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!