长此以往, 觉得这么下去美国危险了,

同学们还没起床吧？左总还在工作哎.

国内的同事干劲非常足，感觉都是在为自己工作，没有人抱怨工作时间长，工作强度大，而且what impressed me most is, 他们的业务水平还是很高的. For 2 months, Dr. Zuo hasn't impressed anybody yet, or, in another word, for 2 months, nobody has been impressed by Dr. Zuo yet, lol… does it sound better this way? Or how about, after 2 months, Dr. Zuo has yet to impress? lol… However, it may change, or it may not, and it's not my intention to impress in the first place(and that might change too). lol...

anyway, 人家除了外语说得差点，但交流起来几乎没有问题，人家也会用很长很大的词，like “intrinsically”, 只不过人家暂时还不会说 “per se”, 但per se 这个东东，听两遍，说两遍也就会了。再说了, 在座的不查字典有多少人知道per se是什么意思? lol… 凭什么你们, 甚至你们住在老年公寓里的父母，享受着高工资，高福利，祖国人民干一倍的活，却只拿着十分之一的报酬？Based on the Law of One Price, 现在全球化这么厉害，no barrier should be high enough to justify such price differential. 所以同学们, 真应该为自己的饭碗，为下一代在全球化大潮中的竞争力好好未雨绸缪了.

NND, 今天又来不及去食堂了, lol… But on the other hand, what gives me the privilege to complain when my coworkers take it for granted, who makes a fraction of a fraction of what I make?

同学们, don’t you think your life is too easy in America, and how long do you think it’ll last? And how are you going to survive when change happens if you are so, figuratively speaking, fat? lol… But don’t worry, I’m sure you’ll still be fine when I come back from dinner or when you wake up tomorrow morning, and you better get up very very early and start running. lol…

所有跟帖： 

• who moved my cheese - dr. zuo's version? ;p -驭风而行- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 04:56:13

• 叫兽，起床了，批判一下这左派又治病，呵呵 -yasas- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 05:11:59

• 承认美国人还是有勤劳的有点，还有守纪律、有TEAM WORK，这些方面中国有待改进。 -lillyflower- ♀ (67 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:17:41

• American companies are efficient. There is a fine line between -xiaoyuzi- ♀ (82 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:16:51

• Not necessarily true -yasas- ♂ (320 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:26:35

• yep, due to its system and elite groups -coolsnow- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:31:28

• 我更担心的是下一代 -asiangirl- ♀ (128 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:25:21

• 美国靠的是整个的体制的耶；不过左总的远虑我们也需有 -coolsnow- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:28:34

• 美国体制 WAS more efficient because China WAS 大锅饭. -LAChinese- ♂ (54 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 07:52:43

• 不是这样滴，中国的整个体制比US昂贵得多 -blueMoon:)- ♀ (96 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:00:44

• Then when it changes, benefit will be huge. The problem for US -LAChinese- ♂ (172 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:05:27

• 你光看到问题，忘了优势 -blueMoon:)- ♀ (758 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 10:04:53

• No, China has a much worse 制度, but the key word here -LAChinese- ♂ (268 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 10:13:52

• 哈，中国体制是有了很大进步，但还有多大空间？ -blueMoon:)- ♀ (58 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 13:54:10

• 我就看着欧洲。今天的欧洲就是将来的美国。高物价，高工资，高失业率。对不对？ -蒙得- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:29:41

• 人家除了外语说得差点? 难道比左右肿的还糟糕? -mknc- ♂ (56 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 06:56:02

• China can become Soveit Union instead of US w/o democracy -usinca- ♀ (262 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 08:41:20

• I guess so called 党内民主 will come first. Something like -LAChinese- ♂ (4981 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 08:50:29

• Wny would GCD ever want to share controling power? -usinca- ♀ (101 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:11:30

• 生产力 changes 生产关系(social system). That's what happened -LAChinese- ♂ (31 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:18:50

• Just 30 years ago, GCD directly managed 95% of resources, -LAChinese- ♂ (444 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 09:50:17

• 换一句话说，中国人自己想过民工般的日子，还要拖着全世界人民跟他一样 -拉胡琴帅哥- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2009 postreply 11:03:12