Facillities in developED countries are older than

the ones in developING countries. That's a given. But you also need to look at the "software" part. To evaluate the capability of an airport, there are a lot more than just the size of the building or when it was built. For starters, the ability to organize and manage as many flights as possible at the same time, and the ability to deal with bad weathers etc.

Pick any evening, go near LaGuardia, and count the planes approaching and departing in any 5 mins span, and then do the same thing at PuDong. You will see the difference.

Again, China is improving and developing with breathtaking speed. The future is bright and it does excite us all Chinese, but to claim it's already more advanced than US in all the areas where we have newer buildings, is very premature.

所有跟帖： 

• W总说的有道理,你们法兰克福机场的天花板很低呀~ -老卵- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 11:25:25

• Haha, I am not a big fan of Frankfurter Flughafen either:) -Warsteiner- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 11:54:41

• Agree - premature- young and old "hotheads" with little brain. -clk430- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 11:51:12

• Agree -- thanks for your commentary on Tom Friedman -聂耳- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 12:49:34

• Good point! Pepole like you really should play w NYTime/CNN -聂耳- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 12:57:32

• Thomas said that , not me :-) -guy100- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 12:33:57

• but it surely looks like Sh and BJ r better than NYC -Guy100- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 12:35:18

• 回复：Facillities in developED countries are older than -playitagain- ♂ (170 bytes) () 08/27/2008 postreply 13:16:06