No. CR's reliability data come from its readers. That's why the

来源: yanif 于 2014-11-12 04:25:16 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (477 bytes)
回答: This article is flawed! 由 Yangtze430030 于 2014-11-11 21:35:31

Educated people believe in books. Their buying decision is heavily influenced by CR. They are also the ones answering the surveys. So it's like a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Now, if the cars they buy are representative of all cars available, it does not matter to some degree. Although one can argue that educated people have different priorities and taste. But from above analysis, it's no way that the cars CR readers bought are representative of all cars.

所有跟帖： 

• But those educated people who answered the survey are owners of -Yangtze430030- ♂ 给 Yangtze430030 发送悄悄话 Yangtze430030 的博客首页 (1276 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 07:00:50

• You are so naive o_o -隐睾- ♂ 给 隐睾 发送悄悄话 (61 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 08:22:19

• Can't agree with you more! -Yangtze430030- ♂ 给 Yangtze430030 发送悄悄话 Yangtze430030 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 09:04:21

• 本坛有”恨车一族“ o_o -隐睾- ♂ 给 隐睾 发送悄悄话 (31 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 09:56:36

• 看看盖勒普（Gallup)如何统计和发表其统计结果就知道CR的方法太小儿科了。 -southmountainer- ♂ 给 southmountainer 发送悄悄话 (4679 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 18:17:00

• 是传教式销售，CR花很多很多年建立的客户群，客户，应该很多老客户是80年代90年代买过日本车，使用坚信CR说的 -soccer88- ♂ 给 soccer88 发送悄悄话 soccer88 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 07:04:44

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！