This article is flawed!

来源: Yangtze430030 于 2014-11-11 21:35:31 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (410 bytes)

For example, the first one regarding the representativeness of CR readers. Why do we need the sample to be representative in this case? If general public is stupid, then we want a sample that is equally stupid to guide us in selecting reliable cars? CR readers are wealthier and more educated, so they are smarter shoppers and their opinions are what we need for selecting reliable cars. Does that make sense?

所有跟帖： 

• No. CR's reliability data come from its readers. That's why the -yanif- ♂ 给 yanif 发送悄悄话 (477 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 04:25:16

• But those educated people who answered the survey are owners of -Yangtze430030- ♂ 给 Yangtze430030 发送悄悄话 Yangtze430030 的博客首页 (1276 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 07:00:50

• You are so naive o_o -隐睾- ♂ 给 隐睾 发送悄悄话 (61 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 08:22:19

• Can't agree with you more! -Yangtze430030- ♂ 给 Yangtze430030 发送悄悄话 Yangtze430030 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 09:04:21

• 本坛有”恨车一族“ o_o -隐睾- ♂ 给 隐睾 发送悄悄话 (31 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 09:56:36

• 看看盖勒普（Gallup)如何统计和发表其统计结果就知道CR的方法太小儿科了。 -southmountainer- ♂ 给 southmountainer 发送悄悄话 (4679 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 18:17:00

• 是传教式销售，CR花很多很多年建立的客户群，客户，应该很多老客户是80年代90年代买过日本车，使用坚信CR说的 -soccer88- ♂ 给 soccer88 发送悄悄话 soccer88 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 07:04:44

• I might not be an educated person but -MoonRiverMe- ♂ 给 MoonRiverMe 发送悄悄话 (168 bytes) () 11/12/2014 postreply 10:34:27

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！