回复：回复：呵呵，二哥的回答有意思吧？可我不明白二哥为何又要问ford...

You are right, 10 years ago Explorer is probably smaller than current CRV, but 10 years ago, every car is smaller.  Size is a relative concept.  When everybody drives a Civic, your Civic is probably safe enough.  If everybody drives a big SUV your Civic is a death trap.  Also, car safety ratings are the comparison among same categories - about the same mass.  It's based on the collision between your car and a still object with a infinite mass.  If your Civic collides with a Explorer, Explorer has a larger mass than your Civic.  Think hard about this.

所有跟帖： 

• 10年前的Explorer也比2011的CRV大.我都开过.根本不是一个级别的东西 -满地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 12:11:35

• 回复：10年前的Explorer也比2011的CRV大.我都开过.根本不是一个级别的东西 -二哥- ♂ (1042 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 13:42:10

• 你知道不知道Explorer早已经不生产2门了?你知道2门4门什么区别吗? -满地找牙- ♂ (121 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 16:53:03

• 回复：你知道不知道 -二哥- ♂ (204 bytes) () 08/19/2011 postreply 07:15:24

• 不就说个车吗,哪里来那么大火气.我可没有兴趣说服谁,讲点事实数据而已 -满地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/19/2011 postreply 09:55:12

• 2011的Explorer压缩了,可能跟2012的加长CRV大小接近些 -满地找牙- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 12:27:33

• 回复： -二哥- ♂ (298 bytes) () 08/18/2011 postreply 13:46:16