Thanks, borisg. The two PM contracts look very similar. The PMs

来源: Bigcat 2015-02-04 07:22:02 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (329 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ Bigcat ] 在 2015-02-04 07:24:51 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
will be responsible for leasing, managing, and collecting rentals. I will pay them fees. The definition looks same in both scenarios, but the logical is totally different. I think I take more risks in the second scenario. What should I pay attention to? The tenant will give me more trouble because I am a long distance landlord.

所有跟帖: 

it is your risk either way -njrookie- 给 njrookie 发送悄悄话 njrookie 的博客首页 (63 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 07:28:23

The PM promises to collect rental for me in the PM contract. -Bigcat- 给 Bigcat 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 07:32:02

it is just that, a promise -njrookie- 给 njrookie 发送悄悄话 njrookie 的博客首页 (76 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 08:00:44

I will have more risk and more power in the second scenario. I w -Bigcat- 给 Bigcat 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/04/2015 postreply 08:05:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”