exactly!

来源: house2005 2012-07-06 12:16:35 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1096 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ house2005 ] 在 2012-07-06 20:25:32 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

In fact, US Open 2010, US Open 2011, Fed could have beat Joker  (2 match points each time), but he chose not to because he knows that he will lose to Nadal in the final anyway. And he does not want to see Nadal to collect more titles and the only guy who can stop Nadal is Joker. Other examples are: Wimbledon 2011, how can he lost to Tsonga with 2 sets to love lead? And more recently is French Open 2012, he just chose to go out quickly to save Joker some energy, hoping Joker to defeat Nadal.

The Only exception is French Open 2011, I do not know why he wanted to beat Joker that time because if he chose to loose to Joker, with Joker's unbelievable form last year, Joker will definitely beat Nadal in the FO final last year. This year, he learned the lesson, but unfortunately Nadal is too strong on clay.

What I am saying is true, because Fed cares about his status in tennis history very much and he knows Nadal is his biggest threat and he is 2 out 10 in grand slam against nadal, that means he only wins 20% of the time in a grand slam against Nadal.

所有跟帖: 

有点阴谋论的味道,但是也确实有点道理哈。 -看风景- 给 看风景 发送悄悄话 看风景 的博客首页 (903 bytes) () 07/06/2012 postreply 12:24:32

老费在美网对纳达尔应该是最好的机会,不至于不打先缴枪 -hurr- 给 hurr 发送悄悄话 (69 bytes) () 07/06/2012 postreply 12:31:40

he scared to death to nadal. -11>2- 给 11>2 发送悄悄话 (59 bytes) () 07/06/2012 postreply 13:12:55

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”