这马P拍的, D3水平. 8-)

所有跟帖： 

• 连瓜哥都佩服这人？看来俺的审美能力有问题了。 -(@_@)- ♂ (65 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 10:28:53

• John Shaw是老牌N+自然摄影师. 大眼兄如果一本他的书~ -瓜哥- ♂ (208 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 10:42:34

• 先问清楚再买书: 这位老兄不会花一半的篇幅教俺怎样曝光吧? -(@_@)- ♂ (27 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 10:53:26

• there is another must read book, "Understanding Exposure" -jzz- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:13:40

• You are kidding me, right? -(@_@)- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:30:18

• Not this time, google it, by Bryan Peterson, -jzz- ♂ (163 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:36:50

• 能告诉俺为什么要花功夫花钱去读这本书嘛?记住咱们都是玩数码的? -(@_@)- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:41:51

• 大眼兄真是开玩笑, 不懂曝光, 也算是玩摄影么? -瓜哥- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:52:36

• it will tell you the diff from "correct exposure" to "right expo -jzz- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:53:11

• 有趣. 能简单介绍一下二者的区别吗? 对于数码正确曝光容易不过. -(@_@)- ♂ (24 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:59:32

• man, you got check out the book, "tech correct may not be -jzz- ♂ (15 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 12:07:19

• 对，著名的sunny 16 rule就是他提出的好像。 -mfcboy- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 10:54:20

• 数码时代,这个法则显得很可笑. 当然,不否认他过去的贡献. -(@_@)- ♂ (21 bytes) () 09/26/2007 postreply 11:01:44