回复：美国法庭问题思考

是誰告訴您"美国法庭在轻罪判决后不可以上诉"????
上訴是沒有問題的,但是能否成功上訴是另外一回事.
自己好好看看這本書再說,不要不懂裝內行.
http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/143207/15414474/productdetail.aspx?promcode=511192

所有跟帖： 

• I think those are the same people -casinoeye- ♂ (444 bytes) () 06/17/2008 postreply 20:52:09

• 回复：shut up again -largetail- ♂ (257 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 07:16:02

• Newstaff = Largetail -casinoeye- ♂ (380 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 08:25:36

• 回复：Newstaff? -largetail- ♂ (265 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 09:10:30

• I will look through it. Thanks -newstaff- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 09:52:26

• 多谢，因为 -newstaff- ♂ (219 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 09:56:32

• 回复：多谢，因为 -單身老貓- ♂ (2440 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 11:25:46

• 回复：回复：多谢，因为 -casinoeye- ♂ (577 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 11:46:58

• Thanks, the fact is -newstaff- ♂ (496 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 13:59:51

• 回复：Thanks, the fact is -單身老貓- ♂ (258 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 15:06:58

• 回复：回复：Thanks, the fact is -casinoeye- ♂ (359 bytes) () 06/18/2008 postreply 16:55:52

• 回复：Thanks, the fact is -watery- ♂ (278 bytes) () 06/21/2008 postreply 16:45:59