这不是Form １０A

这不是Form １０A。F１０A是third party claim (defendant's claim against third party)，你要的是joinder（co-defendant). 区别是third party claim 是 A <-1-> B <-2-> C (三方两个官司），joinder是 A <-1-> (B & C) (三方一个官司）。

好好学习。 http://www.isthatlegal.ca/index.php?name=pretrial.small_claims_court_law_ontario#Transfer, Merger and Joinder

(d) Joinder

Another aspect of the general principle that multiple proceedings are discouraged CJA s.138], is that of "joinder". The concept of "joinder" is related to that of merger, but while merger relates to combining related "proceedings" between different courts, "joinder" relates to adding parties (and less often claims) to a proceeding already in the court.

While the Small Claims rules - unlike the more extensive "Rules of Civil Procedure" which apply to the higher courts - do not set out detailed rules for joinder, the Small Claims court is given express discretion in a settlement conference to order "joinder of parties" [R13.03(3)]. Similarly, while the Small Claims Rules are silent as to joinder of claims, the "Rules of Civil Procedure" which govern the procedure in the Superior Court do expressly consider this. As such it would appear that the general jurisdiction provisions of the Small Claims court are broad enough to encompass authority to join unpleaded claims and issues to a proceeding [R1.03(2)].

所有跟帖： 

• 你真吵啊。我就是不要把CONTRACTOR加成被告。你怎么老非拉我把他们加一起呢。谁打官司找你帮忙，算是倒霉了。 -Veronica007- ♀ (2056 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 12:26:52

• 觉得lexm5其实是在帮你，他只是从另一个角度让你认清你处的形势。 -水中捞月- ♂ (596 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 13:34:17

• 她实际上是假设合同工根本找不到 -lexm5- ♀ (1374 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:06:07

• 你还没明白，你出的主意，什么假装成客户等等。你的前提是建立在被告说的是实话。 -Veronica007- ♀ (526 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:09:47

• 看不下去了。法官说让你加，老猫和Lexm5也解释了加contractor对你有好处。 -单行旅程- ♀ (282 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:14:31

• 不要紧，因为我只有半瓶醋，醋坛子打不翻。 -lexm5- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:22:11

• 不是我假设，而是我根本就找不到。当时法官要求我加之后，那家具店老板的脸乐开了花了。 -Veronica007- ♀ (903 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 14:58:07

• 那你要向法官抱怨 -lexm5- ♀ (985 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:13:20

• 终于听点了正经的了。我现在要引用的是CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT。２００２。 -Veronica007- ♀ (160 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:23:44

• 建议你不要再跟她的贴了，她来这里不是来寻求咨询的， -水中捞月- ♂ (145 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:27:52

• 我好像一头猎狗，看见狐狸就停不下来，也是缺点 -lexm5- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:29:16

• 虽然您嘴巴差，但是我还是很感谢您的参与的。 -Veronica007- ♀ (167 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:51:22

• 开始还满感谢你的建议的。但是现在我不明白， -Veronica007- ♀ (658 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 15:49:19

• 捞月同学 -Veronica007- ♀ (249 bytes) () 07/09/2014 postreply 16:07:32