ZT: Emerging cases of Covid-19 reinfection

来源: fuz 2020-07-12 23:42:55 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (2123 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ fuz ] 在 2020-07-13 01:44:57 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/7/12/21321653/getting-covid-19-twice-reinfection-antibody-herd-immunity

Covid-19 may also be much worse the second time around. During his first infection, my patient experienced a mild cough and sore throat. His second infection, in contrast, was marked by a high fever, shortness of breath, and hypoxia, resulting in multiple trips to the hospital.

Recent reports and conversations with physician colleagues suggest my patient is not alone. Two patients in New Jersey, for instance, appear to have contracted Covid-19 a second time almost two months after fully recovering from their first infection. Daniel Griffin, a physician and researcher at Columbia in New York, recently described a case of presumed reinfection on the This Week in Virology podcast.

It is possible, but unlikely, that my patient had a single infection that lasted three months. Some Covid-19 patients (now dubbed “long haulers”) do appear to suffer persistent infections and symptoms.

My patient, however, cleared his infection — he had two negative PCR tests after his first infection — and felt healthy for nearly six weeks.

…………

I am aware that my patient represents a sample size of one, but taken together with other emerging examples, outlier stories like his are a warning sign of a potential pattern. If my patient is not, in fact, an exception, but instead proves the rule, then many people could catch Covid-19 more than once, and with unpredictable severity.

 

所有跟帖: 

这位医生注意到两种情况:1.初病轻,转阴,几月后再度中招,病较重;2.持续轻症数月,时阳时阴。提示:群免?呵呵 -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:32:13

我理解你的意思。说明:群体免疫不可信 ,身体里的抗体2-3月后就消失了。 -lawattaction- 给 lawattaction 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:35:57

也说明,疫苗也是无望的 -lawattaction- 给 lawattaction 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:37:10

疫苗也许有用,但不是万能的。比如,打了流感疫苗,有些人仍然会得流感,但总体病例数会少很多 -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:48:59

群免也许可能,但不能偏信。改善体质,治基础病,保持隔离,三者不可或缺 -fuz- 给 fuz 发送悄悄话 fuz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:46:25

还有戴口罩和洗手(包括戴手套等):在不可避免的情况下尽量减少病毒浓度进入人体。 -gweipwu- 给 gweipwu 发送悄悄话 gweipwu 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:38:16

群体免疫是“没办法”遮羞布。66%人口染病才能达群体免疫,那得死多少人啊。 -pickshell- 给 pickshell 发送悄悄话 (404 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 05:07:43

也许根本就没有好,表面的死了,深层次的只是潜伏下来,等免疫系统功能下降,再次爆发。 -kai2002- 给 kai2002 发送悄悄话 kai2002 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 13:32:01

很奇怪,医学界为什么不研究用提高人体免疫力的方法应对C-19病毒? -孤舟渔翁- 给 孤舟渔翁 发送悄悄话 孤舟渔翁 的博客首页 (311 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:11:45

渔翁兄好久不见 -dudaan- 给 dudaan 发送悄悄话 dudaan 的博客首页 (68 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:28:04

也希望有相关的信息。 -孤舟渔翁- 给 孤舟渔翁 发送悄悄话 孤舟渔翁 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/14/2020 postreply 06:22:53

你的想法没错,只是做不到 -吃与活- 给 吃与活 发送悄悄话 吃与活 的博客首页 (293 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 09:07:03

同意。 要有个特异性指标来显示经过这种方法处理后与对照组有显著差异的数据,才有人有兴趣来进一步的治疗研究。 -tryyyyyy- 给 tryyyyyy 发送悄悄话 tryyyyyy 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 10:35:41

说到金钟罩,铁布衫,那也是击打自身,但有益无害,也许能说明所谓“应激疗法“可能不会造成细胞因子风暴。 -孤舟渔翁- 给 孤舟渔翁 发送悄悄话 孤舟渔翁 的博客首页 (113 bytes) () 07/14/2020 postreply 06:32:03

我在四月曾贴过一贴,我州一白人女士二次感染 -dudaan- 给 dudaan 发送悄悄话 dudaan 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 09:25:29

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”