How science goes wrong是那期周刊的封面文章。

来源: XYZ3 2014-10-02 00:46:37 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (633 bytes)
Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 “landmark” studies in cancer research.


Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers.

A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are bunk.


In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties.所以不到死马当活马医的时候,不要去参加药物试验。
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”