有人试过了。

来源: 26484915 2014-08-20 04:44:10 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (12517 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 26484915 ] 在 2014-08-20 08:08:02 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

 

微波炉水植物无法生长记者实验辟谣-新闻频道-华商网

news.hsw.cn › 新闻社会Translate this page
Jun 30, 2014 - 微波炉烧的水含有害物质,让植物丧失活性,浇花花死,泡豆子发不了芽。为此,《法制 ... 该网友称,他选择绿豆作为实验对象,分别用微波炉水、纯净水、自来水发绿豆芽,发现微波炉水不能让豆芽生长。该网友用 .... 在恒河边等待死亡.

美国的:

http://www.snopes.com/science/microwave/plants.asp

Origins:   The introductions of new, widely-adopted technologies are often accompanied by fears of possible deleterious effects from the use of such devices, everything from concerns that telephones would spell the end of regional accents to parental admonitions not to sit too close 
 
to the television (lest you ruin your eyes!). Usually these fears are largely allayed after a few years, as the technologies improve and become ubiquitous, and evidence of the feared negative effects fails to materialize. Nonetheless, even though the microwave oven has been a standard household appliance for several decades now, rumors continue to linger that microwaves somehow "change the molecular structure" of consumables and therefore make food products heated in them unsafe to eat. The sample "experiment" represented above is an expression of that sort of rumor, but it is pure junk science, both in its methodology and its conclusions. 

First of all, water heated in a microwave oven is no different in "structure or energy" than water heated with a gas flame, on an electric stove, or over a wood fire: It's just water, plain and simple. More important, though, is the awareness that drawing valid scientific conclusions from experimentation involves conducting multiple trials under carefully controlled conditions, something not in evidence here. The extraneous factors that could have produced the exhibited results (i.e., one live plant and one dead plant) exhibited above are legion. For example:
  • One plant could have been compromised from the very beginning and would have died even if both plants were treated alike.
  •  

  • The container used to store or boil the microwaved water could have introduced a residual substance into the water that hindered plant growth.
  •  

  • The soil or bedding material used for one of the plants might have contained something (either originally or introduced later) that hindered plant growth.
  •  

  • The two containers of water might have been heated and/or cooled unequally, resulting in one plant's receiving warmer water than the other.
  •  

  • The plants might have been subject to differing environmental factors (e.g., light, heat) due to their placement, or affected differently by external factors (e.g., insects, pets).
  •  

  • Since the experiment was not conducted "blindly," the possibility that the experimenter in some way influenced the results cannot be ruled out.
Rather than simply speculate, though, we performed the same experiment in a more controlled manner. We started out with three each of three different types of plants: one member of each set was given water that had been boiled on a gas stove, water that had been boiled in a microwave oven, or water that had not been boiled at all. All the water used in the experiment came from the same source, the same vessel was used for boiling water both on the stove and in the microwave, and all three types of water were stored in identical containers. The water given to all of the plants was at room temperature. The plants were kept in a carefully controlled environment that protected them from our pets and equalized (as much as possible) their exposure to environmental factors and watered in the manner described above for a period of time identical to that of the original experiment. 

As evidenced by the photos below (taken while the plants were briefly removed from the environment in which they were tended and placed in a setting better suited to photography), at the end of that time period all three plants in each set were fairly thriving. When a non-participating observer was asked to indicate (blindly) which plant in each set he thought had fared the best, in two cases he selected plants that had been given microwave-boiled water, and in one case he selected a plant that had been given unboiled water: 

Click to enlarge 
Click to enlarge 
Click to enlarge
As for the coda to the example quoted at the head of this page, there have been some cases in which the use of microwave-heated blood in medical procedures has been cited as causing serious problems, but not because microwave heating "corrupts the DNA." Rather, conventional microwave ovens can heat blood too quickly and/or too unevenly (resulting in hemolysis), so standard (and slower) blood warming procedures are generally preferred or mandated. 

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/science/microwave/plants.asp#GPVXzl8fcybBxOq6.99

所有跟帖: 

youtube上有人试过,只有正常的一半高,结出紫色小辣椒而不是正常绿色。。 -心无挂碍2- 给 心无挂碍2 发送悄悄话 (205 bytes) () 08/20/2014 postreply 14:47:25

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”