对“有科学依据”也要辩证对待

回答: 音乐的随意2014-05-21 09:58:59

有兴趣,可以在网上收听这个(一小时的)讨论: How Reliable Are Scientific Studies?

节目中讲到某一个研究发现文献发表的五十个科学研究只有四个可以被复制证实。
 

In response to growing concern over flawed research practices, Stanford University has created a new center dedicated to studying and improving the process of research itself. We'll talk about the most common scientific shortcomings, proposed solutions and how to judge whether research is reliable.

Host: Dave Iverson

Guests:

  • John Ioannidis, professor of medicine at Stanford University and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS)
  • Steven Goodman, professor of medicine at Stanford University and co-director of METRICS
  • Barbara Spellman, professor of law at the University of Virginia and editor-in-chief of "Perspectives on Psychological Science"


 

所有跟帖: 

要正确对待,引起高度重视。 -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/21/2014 postreply 14:31:11

也就是说,科学依据只有8%的可靠性,够科学的... -医者意也- 给 医者意也 发送悄悄话 医者意也 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/30/2014 postreply 10:17:59

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!