跟喝油无关,只是对你对这几篇文章的结论有存疑

来源: 华山97 2013-09-21 16:58:05 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1827 bytes)
我没有看过原文,不过大概浏览文章摘要,作者宣称结果有统计学上的显著差异。

我不觉得这点样本足够,也不知道这样的研究设计是否合理,只是,您的结论“结论都是2组没有显著差异。所以认为油跟消毒剂,在清洁口腔的功能上,作用等同”是如何得出的?这个是您自己分析实验数据计算结果,还是有其它实验支持您的论点?



RESULTS:

The comparisons of the pre and post therapy values of plaque and modified gingival index score showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.005 and 0.007, respectively) in group I and II. There was a definite reduction in the ORG 1, ORG 2, scores and BANA test score in both groups I and II.

 

RESULTS:

There was a statistically significant reduction of the pre- and post-values of the plaque and modified gingival index scores in both the study and control groups (P < 0.001 in both). There was a considerable reduction in the total colony count of aerobic microorganisms present in both the groups.

 

There was a reduction in the S. mutans count in the plaque and saliva samples of both the study and the control groups. The reduction in the S. mutans count in the plaque of the study group was statistically significant after 1 and 2 weeks (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively); the control group showed significant reduction at all the four time points (P=0.01, P=0.04, P=0.005, and P=0.005, respectively, at 24 h, 48 h, 1 week, and 2 weeks). In the saliva samples, significant reduction in S. mutans count was seen in the control group at 48 h, 1 week, and 2 weeks (P=0.02, P=0.02, P=0.008, respectively).

 

所有跟帖: 

他的显著差异是治疗前后比较,2组都有。 -满地找牙- 给 满地找牙 发送悄悄话 满地找牙 的博客首页 (138 bytes) () 09/21/2013 postreply 17:03:55

谢谢,我回头看了一遍,是这个意思。 -华山97- 给 华山97 发送悄悄话 华山97 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/21/2013 postreply 17:13:29

这么对照证明效力强大啊。语不惊人不罢休。 -betadine - 给 betadine  发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/21/2013 postreply 17:21:28

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!