从阴谋论到主流媒体，之间的距离就是十几个月。
Wall Street Journal 2023年新年第一天opinion section 头条刊登的文章，关于最新的XBB variant.
... "Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution."
... "The same study posits that immune imprinting may be contributing to the viral evolution. Vaccines do a good job of training the immune system to remember and knock out the original Wuhan variant. But when new and markedly different strains come along, the immune system responds less effectively… current herd immunity and BA.5 vaccine boosters may not efficiently prevent the infection of Omicron convergent variants."
... "A New England Journal of Medicine study published last month provides more evidence of the vulnerability caused by immune imprinting. Neutralizing antibodies of people who had received the bivalent were 26 times as high against the original Wuhan variant as they were against XBB and four times as high as they were against Omicron and the BA.5 variant."
... Similarly, a study this month in the journal Cell found that antibody levels of people who had received four shots were 145 times as high against the original Wuhan strain as the XBB variant. A bivalent booster only slightly increased antibodies against XBB. Experts nevertheless claim that boosters improve protection against XBB. That’s disinformation, to use their favored term.
最后终于问出了早该问的问题。
”Another reason may be that monoclonal antibodies are ineffective against XBB, and many older people who catch Covid can't take the antiviral Paxlovid because they have medical conditions such as severe kidney disease or take drugs that interfere with it.
The Biden administration's monomaniacal focus on vaccines over new treatments has left the highest-risk Americans more vulnerable to new variants. Why doesn't that seem to worry the experts?“
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
