你连贴也不看清楚,就急急忙忙来批判是不是有点不妥当?

来源: 26484915 2014-08-24 12:54:59 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1045 bytes)

这个老狼下面已经贴过了。你有什么高见?

这里是wiki的解释,看看是否有道理:

When describing the survival experience of a group of people or patients typically the method of overall survival is used, and it presents estimates of the proportion of people or patients alive at a certain point in time. The problem with measuring overall survival using Kaplan-Meier or actuarial survival methods, is that the estimates include two causes of death: 1) deaths due to the disease of interest and; 2) deaths due to all other causes, which includes old age, other cancers, trauma and any other possible cause of death. In general, we are interested in the deaths due to a disease rather than all causes, and therefore a "cause-specific survival analysis" is employed to measure disease-specific survival. Thus, there are two ways in performing a cause-specific survival analysis。。。。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_survival

所有跟帖: 

你也会狗,那你狗不狗呢?让你说是怎么算的?凡说算法是骗人的,科普一下算法不好吗? -零不是数- 给 零不是数 发送悄悄话 零不是数 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2014 postreply 15:45:54

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”