In the same price range, the buyer gets more from a digital piano than from an acoustic piano. Pianos under $3000 are mostly from crappy to marginally acceptable. However, buyers who are interested in digital piano need to keep one factor in mind: Depreciation.
I bought a ten-year-old Yamaha digital piano, model Clavinova CLP-511, a few days ago. I paid $249. Before making the decision, I did some research. Yamaha discontinued this model in 1998. The list price then was $2499. The owner probably paid around $2000 for it.
If the owner had bought an acoustic piano then, the $2000 would have gotten him a cheapest piano in the showroom, a shinny-black 42’ console, made in China or South Korea. How does a 10-yr old, no-name, shinny black console worth today? I would not be surprised to see people asking for $2000 or more on Craigslist. You are going to see phrases “rarely played”, “like new” in the AD. If you get the price down to around $1500, you get a great deal.
I do not against having digital piano. With the new addition, I own two now. Of course, I have acoustic pianos as well. However, just like buying a house, getting the cheapest may not be the best deal. Resale value has to be included into consideration.
To 黎程程, Lily3 and others who were asking for recommendation on particular models: Since I was on the market for one, I talked with a friend of mine, who owns an authorized service for many major brands. His recommendation was: If new: Yamaha P-140, street price $1000, then you have to buy a stand, a bench and pedal for it. His recommendation on used is Yamaha P-80. He recommended them highly on the touch, sound, and value of those instruments. BTW, he plays, composes on those instruments, and most important, he makes a living on serving them. I trust his opinion.
One last thing: Frequently, I see people here think “touch sensitive” and “weight keys” are the same thing. They are not. I may come back later to explain, or you may do some research to find the right answer.
Good day.
More on digital pianos, & recommendation on medels.
所有跟帖:
•
讲得真清楚,谢谢:))
-胡桃架子--
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:01:41
•
谢谢!
-study-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:04:47
•
Many thanks, Please come back...
-Lily3-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:06:53
•
培养钢琴家,机械钢琴上练。否则就是核武器炸蚊子:
-海底两万哩-
♀
(10 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:09:47
•
写得很好. 不过,这是好玩的东西,不用考虑depreciation吧,又不是投资:)
-笑_脸-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:09:53
•
Just think I wrote this the post to the people who view
-Passerby-
♀
(180 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:24:47
•
写得好.我再补充几句
-MMXIAO-
♀
(641 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:27:45
•
U'r right. The bells & wistles cost $. For same $, the plain one
-Passerby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
11:55:40
•
the plain ones are better.
-Passerby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
11:56:54
•
Would you recommend Clavinnova? If yes, which model?
-lily3-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
10:38:51
•
I'll let you know the model(s) I like after I play them.
-Passerby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
12:27:45
•
I own a CLP & a CVP, both Clavinovas. Yes, they're good.
-Passerby-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
12:02:26
•
Thanks again!.
-lily3-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/27/2009 postreply
18:59:41