This should be analogous to police officer’s liability

Police officers responding to emergencies generally have a degree of immunity from liability for accidents, but this immunity is not absolute. While they are not liable for ordinary negligence, they can be held liable for reckless conduct that endangers others. It is hard to detect people drowning, a lot of them don't struggle 

所有跟帖： 

• 警察的EXEMPTION OF LIABILITY其他地方的一般雇员是没有的。 -borisg- ♂ (233 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:17:00

• 想讹钱呗，这男孩一看就是最少上中产家庭的孩子 -飞黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:20:18

• 查了一下，救生员被判以后，小孩家长接着告了社区，和社区管理公司，后果不知 -飞黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:56:15

• 没有其他证据前，我们还是相信法律和法庭的判决吧 -sayyousayme- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:20:19

• 现在谁还敢在康州当救生员，高中大学的孩子挣个最低工资救了人还惹上官司 -飞黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:26:54

• +1 -随风19- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 10:13:38

• +2。我相信会翻过来。犯罪必须有受害人，动机，行为，机会。他没有动机，行为，不构成犯罪。 -无言无语无声- ♀ (146 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 10:35:19