加州禁止私立非盈利性大学招生实行legacy和donor preference

California bans legacy and donor preferences in admissions at private, nonprofit universities

What you need to know: Governor Newsom signed legislation today prohibiting California’s private nonprofit colleges from considering legacy and donor preferences in college admissions.

Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that he has signed AB 1780 by Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) to prohibit legacy and donor preferences in the admissions process for private, nonprofit institutions. Legacy status and donor preferences have long been excluded from the state’s public university admissions process. The University of California system eliminated legacy preferences in 1998.

“In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work. The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly.”

Governor Gavin Newsom

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling last summer restricting the use of race in college admissions. In light of this shift, proponents of AB 1780 advocated for admissions criteria that additionally ensure that factors like wealth or personal relationships do not unduly influence admissions decisions. AB 1780 aims to ensure that admissions decisions are based on merit rather than personal connections — reducing biases in the admissions process at private colleges in California. 

Under the new law, all private colleges and universities in the state must submit an annual report to disclose compliance. 

Assemblymember Phil Ting: “If we value diversity in higher education, we must level the playing field. That means making the college application process more fair and equitable. Hard work, good grades and a well-rounded background should earn you a spot in the incoming class – not the size of the check your family can write or who you’re related to. I thank the Governor for agreeing with me and supporters of AB 1780 – that every student deserves a fair shot at their dream school.”

所有跟帖: 

加州很有意思:他们最早取缔AA,现在又最早取缔legacy和donor preference -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:28:37

窑洞会不会迁都,东进? -土无垠- 给 土无垠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:28:27

怎么会离开那个大金矿? -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:29:27

暗箱操作,禁止不了。如果不是纯考试,merit based,录取一般都是换汤不换药。 -Pilsung- 给 Pilsung 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:33:32

那行不通,变成高考了。不过取消一个特权是一个,一步步来。 -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:35:43

你觉得纯考试真的灵光么 -jingzhumama- 给 jingzhumama 发送悄悄话 jingzhumama 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:40:28

当然不行。不想孩子成为考试机器。但是我觉得哈佛的筛选还算合理,孩子们优秀的多样性有所展现。 -Pilsung- 给 Pilsung 发送悄悄话 (149 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:47:52

那艺术音乐写作的比赛都不能量化, 咋办 -jingzhumama- 给 jingzhumama 发送悄悄话 jingzhumama 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:55:54

美国好学校很多。其实只要自己努力,去哪家都行。 -成功的梦- 给 成功的梦 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:33:55

反正是holistic。换个角度holistic就行了 -Bailey4321- 给 Bailey4321 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:34:04

no specific punishment for universities violating it 搞笑吗? -STEMkid- 给 STEMkid 发送悄悄话 (298 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:34:06

还会形成舆论压力,面子不好看,我觉得学校会尽量避免上榜。 -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:38:23

这个和建墙类似,肯定不可能完全杜绝,但让犯规的多些障碍多些后顾之忧,也好嘛。 -大西洋里来的人- 给 大西洋里来的人 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:50:15

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!